Comments on: Rules Engine or Event Collaboration http://uglylispcode.wordpress.com/2009/01/09/rules-engine-or-event-collaboration/ lisp cargo cultist trying to lamda Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:23:10 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: gutzofter http://uglylispcode.wordpress.com/2009/01/09/rules-engine-or-event-collaboration/#comment-47 gutzofter Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:20:28 +0000 http://uglylispcode.wordpress.com/?p=184#comment-47 For the next week or so I'm going to be busy. I will touch base with you by Friday. I've cursorily looked at your source and it seems intriguing. For the next week or so I’m going to be busy. I will touch base with you by Friday. I’ve cursorily looked at your source and it seems intriguing.

]]> By: Johan Lindberg http://uglylispcode.wordpress.com/2009/01/09/rules-engine-or-event-collaboration/#comment-46 Johan Lindberg Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:05:25 +0000 http://uglylispcode.wordpress.com/?p=184#comment-46 Then maybe you can help me with MPS - Minimal Production System ;-) see http://github.com/johanlindberg/minimal-production-system/tree/master /Johan Then maybe you can help me with MPS – Minimal Production System ;-) see http://github.com/johanlindberg/minimal-production-system/tree/master

/Johan

]]> By: gutzofter http://uglylispcode.wordpress.com/2009/01/09/rules-engine-or-event-collaboration/#comment-45 gutzofter Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:30:55 +0000 http://uglylispcode.wordpress.com/?p=184#comment-45 I'm of the opinion of writing your own rules engine at this time. With Common Lisp creating DSL becomes quite simple to implement I’m of the opinion of writing your own rules engine at this time. With Common Lisp creating DSL becomes quite simple to implement

]]> By: Johan Lindberg http://uglylispcode.wordpress.com/2009/01/09/rules-engine-or-event-collaboration/#comment-43 Johan Lindberg Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:38:51 +0000 http://uglylispcode.wordpress.com/?p=184#comment-43 > Research on RETE to find the similarities, I think is in order. Most (Rete) rule engine vendors have support for, or are working on support for, CEP. The problems remain the same though and the CEP community seem slightly fragmented around even basic terms and how to use them. AFAICT an event, for example, is not neccessarily the same thing across implementations. /Johan > Research on RETE to find the similarities, I think is in order.

Most (Rete) rule engine vendors have support for, or are working on support for, CEP. The problems remain the same though and the CEP community seem slightly fragmented around even basic terms and how to use them. AFAICT an event, for example, is not neccessarily the same thing across implementations.

/Johan

]]>